SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Del) 65

S.RAVINDRA BHAT, VIJENDER JAIN, VUENDER JAIN
KUTUB PROPERTIES PRIVATE LTD – Appellant
Versus
C. L. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.S.Dhir, K.R.CHAWLA

Vijender Jain, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition has been filed impugning the order vol. CXVII KUTUB PROPERTIES P. LTD. v. C. L. CONSTRUCTION CO. 209 passed by the learned Single Judge dated 23rd July, 2003 whereby exercising jurisdiction under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The learned Single Judge noticed that there was an arbitration clause which has been reproduced in the impugned order and the work was to be completed in terms of tender/contract clauses which was enclosed to a letter given by the appellant to the respondent. Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner vehemently contended that there was no signed arbitration agreement between the parties, only one letter was given to the respondent and on the basis of said letter, the finding of the learned Single Judge that there was a valid concluded arbitration agreement between the parties was perverse. Mr. Chawla has further contended that the petition under Section 11 filed by the respondent was premature as no request was made by the respondent invoking the arbitration clause. Another ground of attack to the impugned order was on account of lack of jurisdiction. It was contended that the appellant had nothing



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top