( 1 ) RULE D. B.

( 2 ) WITH the consent of learned Counsel for the parties, the matter is taken up for final disposal.

( 3 ) CHALLENGE in this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is to the legality and propriety of the order dated 17 July, 2004, passed by the director (Sports), Delhi Development Authority (for short "the DDA"), respondent No. 3 herein, debarring the petitioner from tendering in future for the Sports Wing of the DDA. The petitioner prays for quashing of the said order with a direction to the respondents to award to them the contract for prevention of trespassing and protection of the golf course land of Qutub Golf Course, new Delhi, their bid being the lowest.

( 4 ) THE DDA, through its Chairman, has been impleaded as the first respondent and the second respondent is the Secretary, DDA, Qutub Golf course, New Delhi.

( 5 ) IN the month of December, 2003, the second respondent issued a Notice inviting Tender ("nit" for short) for engagement of a firm for the aforementioned purpose. The tender was to be submitted in two parts. Part I of the tender, viz. , the technical bid was to contain the details of the type of works undertaken; infras