SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Del) 153

J.P.SINGH, VIJENDER JAIN, VUENDER JAIN
H. C. HEMCHANDER – Appellant
Versus
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ADITYA MADAN, ANIL SINGAL

Vijender Jain, J.

( 1 ) NOTICE be issued to show cause as to why rule nisi be not issued.

( 2 ) MR. Aditya Madan, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. Heard.

( 3 ) THIS writ petition can be disposed of at this stage itself. In the impugned order the Tribunal recorded that there was a finding of fact that the petitioner removed the photocopy of the cast certificate and did not return the same to the department. The Tribunal opined that they would not like to interfere with the finding of fact and held that penalty of dismissal from service was disproportionate to the alleged misconduct. The Tribunal remanded the matter to the disciplinary authority to impose any other penalty other than dismissal or removal from service.

( 4 ) I. earned Counsel for the petitioner has drawn our attention to pages 43-44 of the paper book to highlight his plea that the inquiry officer did not hold that the petitioner had removed the photo copy of the caste certificate. The finding at page 44 is that the petitioner through application under proper signature took the photocopy of the caste certificate from Fauzi Missal on 13. 2. 1998 and the charge was that he never deposited it back desp





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top