SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Del) 222

R.S.SODHI
STATE – Appellant
Versus
INDERJIT SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anil Soni

R. S. SODHI, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment dated 28th May, 1985, of the Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi, in Case No. 272/83, whereby the learned Magistrate was pleased to acquit the respondents herein of the offence/charge under Section 7/16 of the PFA Act.

( 2 ) THE brief facts of the case, as has been noted by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, are as under : that on 1-10-83 at about 4-15 P. M. Rajpal Singh, Food Inspector purchased a sample of Maida for analysis under the PFA Act/rules from accused Inderjit Singh at the premises of Khairati Lal, 1080-A Darshan Bhawan, Railway Road, Shahdara, Delhi. One counter-part of the sample was sent for analysis to the Public Analyst who declared the sample to be adulterated on the ground that it contained alcoholic acidity to the extent of 0-14 per cent as against of 0. 12 per cent besides containing 83 per kg of the living and 194 per kg of the dead insects. After the receipt of the public analyst report consent Ex PW4/a was obtained from Secretary Medical, Delhi Admn. And complaint Ex. PW1/a was filed in the court. Accused Inderjit Singh exercised his right u/s 13 (2) of PFA Act and obtained the report of CFS




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top