SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Del) 267

High Court Of Delhi
INDERJEET NAGPAL - Appellant
Versus
DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE - Respondent
BAIL APPLICATION : 1902 of 2004
Decided On : 03/01/2005

Advocates Appeared:
MUKUL ROHTAGI, SATISH AGRAWAL

Headnote:Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 438 — Anticipatory bail — Applicant-accused was alleged to have fraudulently evaded custom duty to tune of Rs. 4.64 crores by misdeclaring and under valuing import of MPEG cards — During investigation applicant-petitioner was alleged to have given voluntary statement u/s. 108 Customs Act admitting all those facts and paid some amount by bank draft and post dated cheques — Statement u/s. 108 of the Act was retracted — Anticipatory bail on plea that applicant was cardiac patient having undergone by-pass surgery in 1977 — Offence u/s. 135(1)(ii) Customs Act was non-bailable as per classification provided in Cr.P.C. — Ill health offered no licence for indulging in criminal activity — Incriminating evidence prima facie reflected complicity of petitioner and allegation were against petitioner of not fully cooperating in investigation — Prayer for anticipatory bail was liable to be declined. (Paras 11 to 13)

       Result : Petition dismissed.

       

B. N. CHATURVEDI, J.

( 1 ) IN anticipation of his arrest on account of being invovled in fraudulent evasion of customs duty to the tune of Rs. 4. 64 crores by way of mis-declaration and under valuation in respect of import of MPEG cards in the names of four firms, namely, M/s. Shri Krishna Impex, M/s. Damodar Enterprises, m/s. Marcos Enterprises and M/s. Nav Durga Enterprises, the petitioner seeks grant of pre-arrest bail under Section 438 Cr. P. C.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is running an office by the name of M/s. Everything international at his residential premises bearing No. C-163, Greater Kailash, Part-I, new Delhi, which was raided by the officials of the respondent, Directorate of revenue Intelligence (DRI), on 3rd of June, 2004 in connection with investigation in regard to import of MPEG cards by aforesaid firms by mis-declaring and under valuing the same as PCB. ON being so required, the petitioner appeared before the concerned DRI officials at 1300 hrs on the same very day to join investigation when he allegedly made a voluntary statement under Section 108 of the Customs Act admitting that the aforesaid firms importing the MPEG cards by mis-declaring and under valuing the same as PCB were being controlled by him during the relevant period. He undertook to deposit the entire customs duty amounting to Rs. 4, 64,42,823/-, which had been evaded, and submitted a demand draft for Rs. 24 lacs and postdated cheques for Rs. 1. 29 crores towards part payment of the aforesaid evaded amount. He also deposited a demand draft for Rs. 8 lacs in the DRI Office at Delhi and Rs. 5 lacs in DRI Office at Bombay as part payment. It is added that on being shown the details of bills of entry and other evidence indicating his involvement in the evasion of customs duty, the petitioner acknowledged the details by giving a certificate on its each page as seen and agreed. Scrutiny of the statement of accounts obtained from bank in regard to the account maintained by the petitioner in the name of his firm M/s. Everything International revealed huge financial transactions between his firm and M/s. Shri Krishana Impex, Goa, over and above the value of PU leather imported.

( 3 ) ACCORDING to the respondent, the petitioner acted as mastermind behind the import of MPEG cards and the owners of the importing firms were simply getting commission of Rs. 10,000/- to Rs. 15,000/- per container, as admitted by Sanjay chauhan, paper proprietor of the firms. It is claimed that the investigation reveals that the petitioner was concerned in procurement, transportation, receipt and sale of impugned goods in local market. One Shri Jawahar Roop Chand is stated to have confirmed in his statement dated 10. 6. 2004 that the petitioner had imported MPEG cards and sold the same in the local market through one Shahji and that it was the petitioner himself who had arranged the money to be given to foreign suppliers.

( 4 ) IN regard to his statement under Section 108 of the Customs Act, the plea on behalf of the petitioner is that he was actually forced to make that statement and that the same, subsequently, stands retracted by him. In regard to various payments alleged to have been made in part payment of the customs duty evaded, it is contended that the petitioner was compelled to make the same in order to save himself from being arrested and such payments, thus, could not be taken to amount to an acknowledgment on his part of his involvement in the commission of offence complained of.

( 5 ) THIS apart, it is submitted that the petitioner is a serious Cardiac patient having undergone a bye-pass surgery in 1997. He had also been a patient of Spinal tuberculosis and in view of his precarious health condition, his arrest and detention would put his life in jeopardy without any useful purpose being served, particularly when he has been regularly joining investigation as and when so required.

( 6 ) THE counter plea of the respondent, on the other hand, is that the investigation i













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top