( 1 ) APPELLANTS have filed this application for condonation of delay in filing this appeal. We find that the appeal is directed against two orders dated 23. 6. 2003 and 26. 7. 2004. Appeal has been filed sometime in August, 2004. However, considering that order dated 23. 6. 2003 which had merged with the order dated 26. 7. 2004, we do not propose to examine whether this appeal was time barred against the first order. The delay in filing the appeal is accordingly condoned. FAO (OS) 154/2004

( 2 ) APPELLANTS are defendants in Suit No. 241/2002 filed by respondent for restraining them from holding any demonstration, blockade or effecting the ingress and egress of plaintiff s, their executives, journalists, other employees, visitors, guests etc in any manner whatsoever. Along with this suit, respondent (plaintiff) also filed ia No. 1092/2002 and obtained an ex-parte ad-interim injunction restraining appellants (defendants), their members, friends, agents from holding any demonstration, blockade etc inside the building premises at PTI Building, 4, parliament Street, New Delhi or outside the said building within a radius of 500 meters from the main gate.

( 3 ) THIS order w