SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Del) 408

G.C.MITTAL
RADHIKA GARG – Appellant
Versus
DELHI UNIVERSITY – Respondent


GITA MITTAL, J.

( 1 ) THESE writ petitions raise questions relating to the manner of exercise of the discretion conferred on the respondents to permit migrations of students from one course and institutions under the Delhi University to another. The impugned order passed in all the petitions is the same and questions raised being identical, these petitions have been taken up together for hearing and disposal. However, it is necessary to note facts of each case in order to appreciate the contentions of the petitioners and the same are so noted.

( 2 ) FACTS in Writ Petition (C) No. 20013/04 entitled Radhika Garg vs Delhi University

(I) the petitioner in this case has claimed that she had a brilliant academic record and scored over 74% in the school leaving examination conducted by the central Board of Secondary Eduction. Based on her grading, she was admitted to the b. Sc. General (Industrial Chemistry) course and was allotted the Atma Ram Sanatan dharam College by the Delhi University (arrayed as respondent no. 1 herein ). The petitioner had deposited fees in respect of such admission in the said college on the 16th October, 2003.

(II) it is submitted that the petitioner was sufferin




























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top