SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Del) 342

T.S.THAKUR
MOTORPRESSE INTERNATIONAL – Appellant
Versus
MISTRALE PUBLISHING PVT. LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
PARIMAL TRIPATHI, PEEYUS A.KOTTAM, SITESH MUKHERJIq

( 1 ) IN this petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner prays for an injunction restraining the respondent from using the trademark and logo Auto Motor and Sport or any substantial reproduction/imitation thereof in relation to any product or services so as to constitute infringement of the petitioner s trade mark and logo. The petition also prays for an injunction restraining the respondent from using any material or article of the petitioner made available to the respondent under the Syndication and Licensing agreement apart from appointment of a Local Commissioner for making an inventory of the products/magazine published by the respondent under the title "auto Motor and sport.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated, the petitioner s case is as under:-

( 3 ) THE petitioner is a company established and organised under the laws of germany. It is engaged in the publication of nearly 100 magazines and journals in nearly 17 countries most of which relate to automobiles. The respondent is also a company but registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956 with its registered office at New Delhi. The respondent too is engaged in publication of magazines in india





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top