SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Del) 382

P.C.JAIN
ASHISH KUMAR PAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
RAJKUMAR SHERAWAT, SATISH TAMTA, SUNIL KAPUR

R. C. JAIN, J.

( 1 ). PRASHANT Kumar Pal along with his brother-Ashish Kumar Pal, stand convicted for the offences punishable under Section 376 IPC, 120b IPC, 506 IPC and section 342 of the IPC. Each of them has been sentenced to undergo RI for seven years and pay fine of Rs. 2,000/- for offence punishable under Section 376 IPC, RI for one year for offence under Section 120b IPC, RI for three years for the offence under section 506 IPC and to undergo six months imprisonment for the offence under section 342 IPC. All the substantive sentences have been ordered to run concurrently vide an order dated 9. 9. 1999. The appellants have filed separate appeals against their conviction and sentence. After the appeal remained pending for some time, vide an order dated 8. 3. 2001 passed by R. S. Sodhi,j, the sentences of the appellants were suspended during the pendency of the appeal on their furnishing personal bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned. Soon after availing the concession of bail, the appellant did not appear in the Court when the criminal appeal was taken up for hearing on 7. 10. 2002 and the court was cons










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top