SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioner by filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has prayed to issue appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents to appoint a special commissioner to expeditiously investigate the offences disclosed in the petition.
( 2 ) AT the outset, it is required to be noted that the petitioner has no personal knowledge in the matter. Some one has come out with some report in the newspaper and the petitioner is seeking the reliefs on the basis of such a report. The matter was placed for admission initially on 12. 12. 2001 when a notice was issued to respondents No. 1 to 3 only and no notice was issued to the rest of the respondents. On 4. 2. 2004, the petitioner requested for deleting the name of respondent No. 4 and accordingly the name of respondent No. 4 was deleted from the array of parties.
( 3 ) IT is also required to be noted that before the present petition was filed by the petitioner, a charge sheet was filed before the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate, chennai wherein it was pointed out that a case was registered on 7. 8. 1993 against shri M. L. Sitaraman, Proprietor of M/s. Southern Art, 10d, First East M
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.