SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Del) 475

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
ABN AMRO BANK NV – Appellant
Versus
RATAN LAL VARMA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMAN USMAN, B.B.SAWHNEY, G.L.N.MURTHY, P.A.S.RAO

Pradeep Nandrajog, J,

( 1 ) PLAINTIFF seeks to amend the suit as under:

" (I) to add the words in his personal capacity and in the description of the defendant No. 2 in the cause-title and Memo of Parties immediately before the words in his capacity as coparcener. . . . . . (ii) to add the following para numbered as 23a after the present para 23 so as to correctly reflect the present factual position: 23a. However, upon institution of the present suit, the plaintiff deposited the keys of the suit premises with the Registrar of this hon ble Court after being granted permission by this Hon ble court to do so, and stopped maintaining watch and ward at the premises. (iii) to add the following sub-para at the end of the present para 24: without prejudice to the foregoing, in any case, as on 31. 1. 2001 a sum of Rs. 21,42,951. 50 as principal outstanding balance amount of security deposit paid under the Lease Agreement dated 12. 10. 1994 was admittedly due to the plaintiff from the defendant No. 1. Likewise, a sum of Rs. 34,12,500/- as outstanding principal balance of security deposit paid under the Agreement dated 12. 10. 94 relating to lease/hire of furniture, fixtures and fittings

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top