SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Del) 601

MANJU GOEL
RACHNA GEERA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Alok Mathur, DINESH KUMAR, O.P.SAXENA

( 1 ) THIS petition seeks quashment of FIR No. 768/2000 under Sections 406/420/468/471/ 34 IPC registered at Police Station Connaught place, New Delhi registered at the instance of the respondent No. 2 namely, The Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd. (HSBC ). The petitioners, namely, Mrs. Rachna Gera and Mr Lalit Gera obtained loan from the complainant bank for purchase of a car under a Hire Purchase Agreement and the petitioners appear to have committed defaults in paying the instalments. In the FIR, it is alleged that the complainant demanded the vehicle when the defaults in paying the instalments were made and the petitioners failed to produce the vehicle giving rise to a suspicion in the mind of the complainant that the vehicle has been sold away to some third party and that for doing so a written consent of the complainant bank may have been forged.

( 2 ) THE complainant/respondent No. 2 bank and the petitioners have compromised. The petitioners, therefore, pray for quashment of the complaint. A Compromise Agreement has been placed on record Mr. Alok Narayan mathur, Attorney Holder of the Respondent no. 2/bank is present before the Court along with his counsel and c




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top