SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Del) 616

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
MOHAN CONSTRUCTION CO. – Appellant
Versus
DDA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MONICA SHARMA, SANDEEP SHARMA

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

( 1 ) PRESENT order disposes of objections filed by DDA under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 to the award dated 6. 10. 1995 made and published by sh. A. C. Panchdhari, the sole arbitrator appointed to decide the disputes and differences between M/s. Mohan Construction Company and DDA arising out of contract agreement No. 2/dd-1/dda/82-83.

( 2 ) THE objections are the usual ones filed against each and every award suffered by DDA. Objections are argumentative, unfortunately without any substance. Indeed, at the hearing held on 18. 5. 2005, counsel for the DDA could hardly shake the foundation of the award or any part thereof. Objections which run into 33 pages are without reference to a single document. I have repeatedly directed dda to ensure that in the objections reference is made to the documents relied upon by DDA to challenge findings of arbitrators. On 24. 1. 2005, I had directed DDA to file brief written synopsis indicating the submissions and page number of the document relied upon. Matter was posted for arguments on 18. 5. 2005. It is to be regretted that counsel for DDA has chosen not to do the needful notwithstanding the fact that nearly 4 m



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top