SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Del) 491

S.K.AGARWAL
MANJEET KAUR – Appellant
Versus
AMARJEET KAUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
SURESH SINGH, VIJAY KISHAN, VIKRAM JAITLEY

S. K. Agarwal, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application moved by the parties, praying for directions to registry to draw the decree in the suit in terms of Order dated 4. 12. 2002 without requiring filing of valuation report and supply of non-judicial stamp papers.

( 2 ) FACTS in brief are as follows: The plaintiff filed a suit for partition and rendition of accounts, pleading that Kartar Singh was the absolute owner in possession of immovable properties (1) Two and a half storeyed building bearing No. C-4/6. Rama Pratap Bagh, Delhi, (2) Garage Nos. 9-10 at Gulabi bagh, Delhi, and (3) Property No. C. W. 71, Sanjay Gandhi Transport Nagar, delhi. He died on 4. 4. 1992 leaving behind Plaintiffs and defendant Nos. 2 and 4 (daughters), Smt. Amarjit Kaur (widow) and Karamjit Singh (minor son ). Kartar Singh got married with defendant No. 1 after the death of his first wife. Plaintiffs and defendant Nos. 3 and 4 are children from the first wife. Plaintiffs prayed for a decree of partition, by metes and bounds of 1/6 share in the immovable properties. On 4. 12. 2002, an application was moved by the parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC, praying for disposal of the suit in terms












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top