SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Del) 496

BADAR DURREZ AHMED
MUNNA KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
PAVAN SHARMA, RASHID HASHMI

BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J.

( 1 ) THE offence alleged against the petitioner is one under Section 143 of the railways Act, 1989. The learned counsel for the petitioner points out that in view of section 180d of the said Act which has been introduced in the statute book by Act 51 of 2003 w. e. f. 01. 07. 2004, the said offence would be bailable. Section 180d of the said Act reads as under:- 180d. Inquiry how to be made against arrested person.--

(1) When any person is arrested by the officer authorised for an offence punishable under this Act, such officer shall proceed to inquire into the charge against such person.

(2) For this purpose, the officer authorised may exercise the same powers and shall be subject to the same provisions as the officer in charge of a police station may exercise and is subject to the provisions of the Code of Criminal procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), when investigating a cognizable case: provided that-- (a) if the officer authorised is of the opinion that there is sufficient evidence or reasonable ground of suspicion against the accused person, he shall either admit him to bail to appear before a Magistrate having jurisdiction in the case, or forward him in custody




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top