SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Del) 631

MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, REKHA SHARMA
R. S. MISRA – Appellant
Versus
UOI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.K.BHARDWAJ, S.RAJAPPA

MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner herein was working as P. G. T. (Chemistry) with the respondent No. 1 since July, 1976. An advertisement was issued by the respondent sometime in the month of June, 1986 calling for applications for filling up certain vacancies in the post of Principal in Kendriya Vidyalaya : 2 : WP (C) NO. 8451/2005 Sangathan (in short `kvs ) against Direct Recruitment Quota. The petitioner also submitted an application as against the aforesaid advertisement praying for considering his case for such appointment to the post of principal-KVS against the direct Recruitment quota. The petitioner was called for the interview for the purpose, wherein he appeared and he was interviewed by the Selection Committee constituted especially for the aforesaid purpose.

( 2 ) THE grievance of the petitioner is that although he was selected in the said selection by the said Committee, he was not appointed as against one of the aforesaid vacant posts of Principal-KVS, due to the bias on the part of the respondent. In order to prove bias, the petitioner has alleged before the Tribunal and also before this Court that while he was working as Principal, proceedings were drawn u











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top