SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Del) 627

BADAR DURREZ AHMED
KAPIL DEV – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.N.DUDEJA, S.S.DAS

BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J.

( 1 ) IT is a case for the prosecution that a recovery of 500 grams of heroin is said to have been made from the present petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that no such recovery was made at all and the petitioner has been framed in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner s father Shri Gulab Singh has, for several years prior to the date of incident, been writing letters and articles with regard to the spread of narcotic drugs and the fact that the people involved in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances were not being apprehended. To substantiate this aspect the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner s father had written various letters including letters to the Prime Minister, copies of some of which are placed on record in the present petition.

( 2 ) THE learned counsel for the petitioner also submitted that this is the second bail application before this court. The first bail application was rejected by an order of this court on 04. 05. 2004 in the following terms: heard. The petitioner has been allegedly found in possession of 500 gram smack. Bail is claimed mainly on the ground that case















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top