BADAR DURREZ AHMED
KAPIL DEV – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) IT is a case for the prosecution that a recovery of 500 grams of heroin is said to have been made from the present petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that no such recovery was made at all and the petitioner has been framed in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner s father Shri Gulab Singh has, for several years prior to the date of incident, been writing letters and articles with regard to the spread of narcotic drugs and the fact that the people involved in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances were not being apprehended. To substantiate this aspect the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner s father had written various letters including letters to the Prime Minister, copies of some of which are placed on record in the present petition.
( 2 ) THE learned counsel for the petitioner also submitted that this is the second bail application before this court. The first bail application was rejected by an order of this court on 04. 05. 2004 in the following terms: heard. The petitioner has been allegedly found in possession of 500 gram smack. Bail is claimed mainly on the ground that case
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.