SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Del) 691

A.K.SIKRI
PUSHPA KATOCH – Appellant
Versus
MANU MAHARANI HOTELS LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.S.CHANDHIOK, JYOTI MENDIRATTA, SANJOY GHOSE

A. K. Sikri,j.

( 1 ) BY means of this appeal the appellant is challenging two orders of the Company Law Board (in short the clb ); first order is dated 12th january, 2001 passed in CP No. 16/2000 filed by the appellant herein whereby the appellant s petition under Sections 397/398 of the Companies Act (in short the act ) alleging oppression and mismanagement on behalf of the majority shareholders, was disposed of by giving certain directions; second order dated 30th August, 2001 is passed by the CLB in CA No. 93/2001 seeking review of order dated 12th January, 2001. By the impugned order the said review application of the appellant herein was dismissed.

( 2 ) IT may be noted at this stage that against the order dated 12th January, 2001 passed in CP No. 16/2000, the appellant herein had earlier also filed an appeal in this Court being Co. A. (B) No. 4/2001. However, on 25th April, 2001 when that appeal came up for hearing the appellant sought leave of the Court to withdraw the said appeal as she was willing to seek review of CLB s order dated 12th January, 2001. That appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to the right, if any, of the appellant to file an a

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top