SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Del) 692

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
NOVARTIS AG – Appellant
Versus
WANBURY LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.M.SINGHVI, ANURADHA SALHOTRA, BHUVAN GUGNANI, P.V.KAPUR, SUDHANSHU BATRA

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.

( 1 ) I dispose of IA No. 3609/2005 filed by the plaintiff under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2, CPC praying that for the reasons stated in the affidavit accompanying the injunction application, the defendants, their representative agents, assigns, successors, dealers, servants be restrained by an interlocutory injunction restraining them from manufacturing, packing, selling, distributing, marketing, dealing with any product bearing the trade mark CORIMINIC or any other trade mark deceptively similar to the plaintiff s trade mark TRIAMINIC and/or TRIOMINIC and from using a packaging/ trade dress which is deceptively similar to the packaging/trade dress of the goods sold under the plaintiff s trade mark TRIAMINIC.

( 2 ) PLAINTIFF is a swiss company manufacturing and selling pharmaceutical preparations. First defendant is a company registered in India and upto 6. 9. 2004 was functioning as the distributor of the plaintiff in India. Second defendant, also a company registered in India is manufacturing a cough syrup for the first defendant. The syrup is being marketed under the trade mark coriminic. Plaintiff is manufacturing and selling cough syrup under the trade mark TR






















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top