SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Del) 968

MADAN B.LOKUR
UNION BANK OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
SUSHILA GOELA – Respondent


MARKANDEYA KATJU, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal has been filed against the judgment of the additional District Judge Delhi in Suit No. 560/04/01.

( 2 ) HEARD learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

( 3 ) THE Plaintiff/respondent filed a suit for ejectment, recovery of Rs. 58000/- and damages of Rs. 29,000/- per day w. e. f. 1. 7. 2001 in respect of premises No. 625-632, ward VI, Chandni Chowk, Delhi against the defendant on 2. 7. 2001.

( 4 ) THE Plaintiff/respondent are owners of the suit premises. They inducted the defendant bank as a tenant of the said premises in an area of 5528 sq. ft.

( 5 ) THE lease deed executed on 10. 9. 1990 between the lessors and the appellant bank (lessees) stated that the lease is for 10 years commencing from 1. 7. 1986 i. e. ending on 30. 6. 1996. There was a clause in the lease deed which stated that the lessee shall have the right to renew the lease of the premises for another period of five years after 30. 6. 1996 on the same terms and conditions except increase of rent by 20%. The initial rate of rent was Rs. 47520/- per month. The tenancy of the appellant bank was to expire on 30. 6. 1996, but the defendant bank (the appellant) exercise



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top