R.C.JAIN
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
PREM KHANNA – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal under Section 54 of the Foreign exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (in short fera ) read with Section 35 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (for short fema ) is directed against the order of the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange dated 19. 5. 2003 thereby dismissing a revision petition filed by the Enforcement Directorate against the order of Special director of Enforcement (Adjudicating Authority) dated 27. 3. 2001 by which the Adjudicating Authority exonerated the respondent/noticee Prem Khanna of the charges under section 8 (1) of FERA and dropped the charges/proceedings against him.
( 2 ) BRIEFLY, the relevant facts leading to the present appeal are that a show-cause notice No. T-4/60- b/sde/pka/99 dated 17th June, 1999 was issued to the respondent-Prem Khanna with the allegations that during the period 1993-1995 he had unlawfully acquired Sterling ponds 4,22,515. 00 in India in violation of Section 8 (1) of FERA read with Rule 4 of Non-resident (External) accounts Rules, 1970 read with Foreign Exchange Manual, 1993. The allegation against the respondent was that he is a Non-resident Indian having business concerns in united Kingdom.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.