SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
N. RANGA RAO – Appellant
Versus
ANIL GARG – Respondent
( 1 ) THE colours of a rainbow are striking and universal. A combination of colours creates its own kaleidoscope. A colour is not the property of any individual, but colour combinations used in a particular pattern may create identification with a product.
( 2 ) WHAT s in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would also smell as sweet , said William shakespeare. There is but still a tendency to copy the names because a rose is a rose. An amalgam of colour combinations, names and logos may create a total identification with a product and the allegation of copying the same has given rise to the present litigation.
( 3 ) THE plaintiff is a registered partnership firm engaged in the business of manufacture of incense sticks or agarbathies. Initially, the business was established as a proprietorship concern in 1948 by the father of the present partners of the plaintiff firm and is stated to be now a part of the RANGSONS GROUP started by late Shri n. Ranga Rao. The diversified business now carried on by the Group is stated to not only include the business in question, but also other businesses like electronics and education, though the flagship firm o
Kellogg Company v. Pravin Kumar Bhadabhai
Cadila Health Care Ltd. v. Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
S.M. Dyechem Ltd. v. Cadbury (India) Ltd.
Amritdhara Pharmacy v. Satya Gupta
REFERRED TO : Ruston and Hornsby Ltd. v. The Zamindara Engineering Co.
American Home Products Corporation v. Mac Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.
Kaviraj Pandit Durga Dutt Sharma v. Navaratna Pharmaceutical Laboratories
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.