SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Del) 873

High Court Of Delhi
PEARSON EDUCATION INC. - Appellant
Versus
PRENTICE HALL INDIA (P) LTD. - Respondent
C.O.A.(SB.) : 20 of 2004
Decided On : 09/08/2005

Advocates Appeared:
ATUL SHARMA, C.A.SUNDARAM, DINESH PARDARANI, GOPAL JAIN, NEEL MASON, SANJIV BANERJEE, SHIRAZ CONTRACTOR PATODIA, SUDIPTO SARKAR

Headnote:Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 397, 398, 402, 406 and 408 — Allegation of oppression and mismanagement — Closely held company run on quasi-partnership basis — Issuance of share capital without any justification — Allegation of mala fide as 75% of money collected through capital was repaid by way of dividend — Dispute between holding company with minority shares and the Indian group holding majority shares — Option given to transfer the share holding — The petitioner insisting that the words "Prentice Hall" be removed from the title of the company — Appeal against order of CLB disposed of with option given to both the groups to either buy the share holding of the other or to sell him the shareholding, in terms of the order.

A. K. SIKRI, J.

( 1 ) PRENTICE Hall Inc. (now merged with Pearson education Inc.-appellant in Co. A. (SB) No. 20/2004), a well known publisher of international repute, wanted its foothold on Indian soil. Cerebrated move was to incorporated a company in India in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Companies Act. The proposed company was intended to be its subsidiary in India with objective to print and publish Indian editions of its educational titles for sale in India and export to such countries as would be specified. This idea struck prentice Hall Inc. some time in the year 1962. There were stringent laws at that time for setting up a subsidiary company by a foreign company and prior permission of the Government of India was a requisite precondition for this purpose. It, therefore, sought approval of the Government of India for this purpose. This request of Prentice Hall Inc. was considered by the government of India and it accorded approval for setting up a company for the aforesaid purpose with the condition that the foreign shareholding in the proposed company would be on a minority basis and not exceeding 49%. This foreign company, therefore, needed an Indian partner and understanding was accordingly arrived at with one Mr. B. D. Laroia for the incorporation of a company. Resultantly, Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Company) was born when certificate of incorporation was given on or about June 6, 1963. The raison-d -atre to incorporate this company was made its primary object viz. , to acquire the rights to print, reprint, translate, adapt, publish and sell in india and export to any other Asian or other countries low-cost, standard text books and other books for schools, colleges, universities or other institutions or books for any other purpose primarily relating to subjects to Science, Technology, Literature, Fine Arts, economics, Law and other subjects the copyright of such books which are owned or may be owned by Prentice Hall inc. , USA, (A Corporation registered under the Laws of the State of Delaware, USA) or by any of the Corporations associated with or subsidiary of the said Prentice Hall inc. , USA, and to allow royalty and other payments to be made to Prentice Hall In c. , USA, or to any of its associate or subsidiary corporation or to any Indian or foreign authors on sales made in India or outside India on such terms and conditions and for such duration as may be mutually agreed upon, subject to restriction, if any, imposed by the Government of India.

( 2 ) ON June 6, 1963 itself, a Collaboration agreement was also entered into between Prentice Hall inc. and the company under which Prentice Hall Inc. granted licence to the company, inter alia, to re-print and sell the books included in the schedule to such agreement of which Prentice Hall Inc. was the owner of the copyright and in respect of such other books as would be mutually agreed between Prentice Hall Inc. and the company. Life of this agreement was 10 years, subject to the right of Prentice Hall Inc. to terminate the same. This collaboration agreement also provided that in the event the appellant terminated the agreement, the company would omit the words Prentice and Hall from its name. Prentice Hall Inc. also permitted the company to use its mark i. e. Prentice Hall.

( 3 ) MR. B. D. Laroia continued to hold the majority shares in the company and after his death the said shareholding was transferred in the name of his wife. Mr. Ashok K. Ghosh joined the company as an employee and some time in the year 1972 he was appointed as the managing Director. In the year 1973 Mr. Ghosh purchased the entire shareholding of Laroia s, as widow of Mr. B. D. Laroia was reluctant to continue to be associated with the company. In that year Foreign Exchange Regulation act, 1973 was also enacted by the Indian Parliament as per which, foreign equity in a company had to be below 40%. Prentice Hall Inc. accordingly reduced its share










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top