SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Del) 1073

A.K.SIKRI
TITAN INDUSTRIES – Appellant
Versus
NITIN P. JAIN – Respondent


A. K. SIKRI, J.

( 1 ) THE defendants have moved this application under Order VII Rule 11 (d) of the Code of civil Procedure read with Section 106 (1) of the Trade marks and Merchandise Act, 1958 (for short `the Act ) for rejection of the plaint. Before coming to the grounds on which the defendants want rejection of the plaint, I may state the case of the plaintiff in the suit.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff, Titan Industries Ltd. , is a joint venture of Tata Group and the Tamil Nadu industrial Development Corporation (TIDCO ). It was incorporated in the year 1987 and its activities include manufacture and marketing of watches, clocks and jewellery. It enjoys a 25% share of the total domestic market. The cause of filing the present suit is the manufacturing and marketing of watches by the defendants under the trade name SONA. It is alleged that the defendants have not only adopted a deceptively similar trade mark, but have also adopted a similar lay out and get up for the packaging and have copied the dials of the plaintiff. Therefore, present suit is filed for permanent injunction, delivery of rendition of accounts and damages. For the purpose of the application filed by the defendants, we ar




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top