SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Del) 291

MANMOHAN SARIN
CHANDRA PRABHA DOGRA – Appellant
Versus
LIC OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.S.Chaturvedi, KAMAL MEHTA

Manmohan Sarin, J

( 1 ) PETITIONER by this writ petition impugns the Orders dated 20. 1. 2002, 15. 5. 2002 and 17. 4. 2003 passed by respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 respectively by which the petitioner s agency was terminated and the renewal commission forfeited. Petitioner also seeks a direction for restoration of the agency from the date of termination with continuity of benefits. A direction for payment of renewal commission together with interest is also sought.

( 2 ) PETITIONER had earlier filed W. P. (C ). No. 5389/2003, which was disposed of with a direction to the Chairman, LIC to decide the memorial of the petitioner dated 30th September, 2002. The said memorial was rejected by the Chairman LIC by the impugned Order dated 17. 4. 2004. Notice was issued in the writ petition on 3rd November, 2003. Vide Order dated 12th February, 2004, respondent nos. 4 and 5, namely, the Insurance Regulatory Development Authority and Union of India were deleted as parties. Cost of Rs. 1500/- was imposed and time to file counter affidavit was granted.

( 3 ) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner today sought time to file rejoinder. On 12. 2. 2004, two weeks time was granted to the petitioner to file th













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top