MANMOHAN SARIN
RAKESH BEDI – Appellant
Versus
AIR INDIA LTD. – Respondent
( 1 ) PETITIONER-RAKESH BEDI, A SR. TRAFFIC ASSISTANT, WORKING WITH AIR INDIA, WAS ISSUED A CHARGE SHEET ON 29. 7. 1996, ACCUSING HIM OF MIS-CONDUCT AND BREACH OF STANDING ORDERS. THE GRAVAMEN OF THE CHARGE WAS HABITUAL ABSENCE WITHOUT LEAVE FOR EXTENDED PERIODS OF TIME, WILLFUL INSUBORDINATION SUBVERSIVE OF DISCIPLINE. AN ENQUIRY COMMITTEE WAS CONSTITUTED. REPEATED ADJOURNMENTS WERE SOUGHT ON MEDICAL AND OTHER GROUNDS. ENQUIRY COMMITTEE AFTER CONSIDERING THE ENTIRE RECORD, INCLUDING THE EXPLANATION, AS FURNISHED BY THE PETITIONER SUBMITTED ITS REPORT. A COPY OF REPORT WAS SENT TO PETITIONER. THIS WAS FOLLOWED BY A SHOW CAUSE NOTICE, PROPOSING PENALTY ON PETITIONER. PETITIONER REPLIED TO THE SAME. RESPONDENT VIDE ITS ORDER OF 12. 5. 1998 METED OUT THE PUNISHMENT OF "dismissal WITH RETIREMENT BENEFITS IN FULL. "
( 2 ) RESPONDENT-AIR INDIA LIMITED HAD ALSO SOUGHT APPROVAL UNDER SECTION 33 (2) (B) OF THE INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT FROM THE NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT MUMBAI, SINCE PETITIONER WAS A PROTECTED WORKMAN.
( 3 ) BY THIS WRIT PETITION, PETITIONER SOUGHT QUASHING OF THE DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AND ORDER OF PUNISHMENT DATED 12. 5. 1998 AND HIS REINSTATEMENT
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.