SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Del) 604

R.S.SODHI
BUNDHU KHAN – Appellant
Versus
AHMED HUSSAIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMARJIT SINGH, S.K.VERMA

R. S. SODHI, J.

( 1 ) THIS PETITION CHALLENGES THE ORDER DATED 27. 09. 2003 OF THE ADDITIONAL RENT CONTROLLER, DELHI IN E-234/2002 WHEREBY THE LEARNED ADDITIONAL RENT CONTROLLER WHILE ADJUDICATING ON A PETITION FOR EVICTION FILED ON 6. 10. 2002 UNDER SECTION 14 (1) (E) OF THE RENT CONTROL ACT (FOR SHORT THE ACT) HAS DECREED A SUM VIDE ORDER DATED 27. 9. 2002.

( 2 ) THE BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE AS NOTED BY THE ADDITIONAL RENT CONTROLLER ARE AS FOLLOWS:

". . . . THAT THE PETITIONER (RESPONDENT HEREIN) CONSTRUCTED THE TENANTED PREMISES,i. E. ONE QUARTER IN PROPERTY NO. 69, GALI SCHOOL WALI, KHUREJI KHAS, DELHI - 51 IN THE YEAR 1979 AND LATER ON LET OUT TO THE RESPONDENT FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES ONLY IN THE MONTH OF OCTOBER, 1982. THE PETITIONER IS THE OWNER/landlord OF THE PROPERTY AND THE RESPONDENT IS PAYING RENT TO THE PETITIONER FROM THE VERY BEGINNING AND OBTAINING RENT RECEIPTS. THE PETITIONER IS RESIDING IN PROPERTY NO. 66, KHUREJI KHAS, DELHI WHICH IS ADJOINING TO THE TENANTED PREMISES OF THE RESPONDENT. THE PETITIONER IS RESIDING IN PROPERTY NO. 66, KHUREJI KHAS, DELHI ALONG WITH ELEVEN OTHER MEMBERS WHICH ARE AS FOLLOWS:- (1) WIFE OF THE PETITIONER NIFISA BEGUM, AGED 64 YEARS,






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top