R.S.SODHI
BUNDHU KHAN – Appellant
Versus
AHMED HUSSAIN – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS PETITION CHALLENGES THE ORDER DATED 27. 09. 2003 OF THE ADDITIONAL RENT CONTROLLER, DELHI IN E-234/2002 WHEREBY THE LEARNED ADDITIONAL RENT CONTROLLER WHILE ADJUDICATING ON A PETITION FOR EVICTION FILED ON 6. 10. 2002 UNDER SECTION 14 (1) (E) OF THE RENT CONTROL ACT (FOR SHORT THE ACT) HAS DECREED A SUM VIDE ORDER DATED 27. 9. 2002.
( 2 ) THE BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE AS NOTED BY THE ADDITIONAL RENT CONTROLLER ARE AS FOLLOWS:
". . . . THAT THE PETITIONER (RESPONDENT HEREIN) CONSTRUCTED THE TENANTED PREMISES,i. E. ONE QUARTER IN PROPERTY NO. 69, GALI SCHOOL WALI, KHUREJI KHAS, DELHI - 51 IN THE YEAR 1979 AND LATER ON LET OUT TO THE RESPONDENT FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES ONLY IN THE MONTH OF OCTOBER, 1982. THE PETITIONER IS THE OWNER/landlord OF THE PROPERTY AND THE RESPONDENT IS PAYING RENT TO THE PETITIONER FROM THE VERY BEGINNING AND OBTAINING RENT RECEIPTS. THE PETITIONER IS RESIDING IN PROPERTY NO. 66, KHUREJI KHAS, DELHI WHICH IS ADJOINING TO THE TENANTED PREMISES OF THE RESPONDENT. THE PETITIONER IS RESIDING IN PROPERTY NO. 66, KHUREJI KHAS, DELHI ALONG WITH ELEVEN OTHER MEMBERS WHICH ARE AS FOLLOWS:- (1) WIFE OF THE PETITIONER NIFISA BEGUM, AGED 64 YEARS,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.