SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Del) 626

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
ATMA RAM PROPERTIES (P) LTD. – Appellant
Versus
ALLAHABAD BANK – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
L.K.Garg,

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is a perpetual lessee of premises bearing Office No. 2, First Floor and Servant Quarter 113 and 115, Atma Ram Mansion (Scindia House), Connaught Circus, Janpath, New Delhi which was given on lease to respondent No. 1, a nationalised bank. The petitioner terminated the lease vide a legal notice dated 17. 8. 1991 issued under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act. The notice was replied to by respondent No. 1, the bank on 8. 9. 1991 alleging that the premises in question are covered by the provisions of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as the PP Act ) and claiming that the provisions of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Rent Act ) are not applicable. Respondent No. 1 thus refused to vacate the premises.

( 2 ) THE petitioner thereafter issued a notice dated 13. 9. 1991 to respondent No. 2, Secretary, Ministry of Finance asking for the appointment of an Estate Officer under Section 3 of the PP Act in view of the fact that respondent No. 1 was an unauthorized occupant of the public premises so that the petitioner could seek eviction from the premi
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top