SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Del) 1130

High Court Of Delhi
BIMLA DEVI - Appellant
Versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI - Respondent
W.P.(C.) 10404 of 2004
Decided On : 12/02/2004

Advocates Appeared:
ANIL AGARWAL, RUPESH KANVAR, S.P.SINGH

Compassionate appointments are subject to various factors and limitations, which may result in the acceptance of a lower-ranked position despite eligibility for a higher position.

Headnote:

Compassionate Appointment - Eligibility for LDC Position - The court considered the petitioner's claim for appointment as an LDC despite being initially appointed as a Mali on compassionate grounds. The court acknowledged the petitioner's qualifications but emphasized the circumscribing factors in compassionate appointments, including the percentage of posts allocated, vacancies, and individual circumstances. The court directed the consideration of the petitioner for an LDC position on a work-charge basis, subject to availability of vacancies.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, appointed as a Mali on compassionate grounds, sought consideration for an LDC position based on her qualifications and experience in performing clerical functions.

Finding of the Court:

The court acknowledged the petitioner's qualifications and experience but emphasized the limitations in compassionate appointments. It directed the consideration of the petitioner for an LDC position on a work-charge basis, subject to availability of vacancies.

Issues: Eligibility for LDC position, Circumscribing factors in compassionate appointments

Ratio Decidendi: Compassionate appointments are subject to various factors such as the percentage of posts allocated, vacancies, and individual circumstances, which may result in the acceptance of a lower-ranked position despite eligibility for a higher position.

Final Decision: The petition was disposed of with a direction for the consideration of the petitioner for an LDC position on a work-charge basis, subject to availability of vacancies.

MANMOHAN SARIN, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner who had completed her senior secondary schooling and belongs to jat community was appointed as Mali on 14. 8. 2000. It was a case of compassionate appointment. Petitioner on account of her qualifications, says that she meets the eligibility condition for the post of LDC. It is the petitioner s case that work of provident fund calculations, which is the duty assigned to a clerk, was being got done from her during the period from 19. 10. 2000 to 13. 7. 2004. Petitioner s case is that though performing the duties of clerk and being possessed of requisite qualifications for the post of LDC and despite an LDC position, being available, petitioner had been continued on the post of mali.

( 2 ) IT is urged that upon petitioner filing the writ petition in this Court, the respondents immediately thereupon assigned the job of mali to the petitioner. Petitioner has also produced on record the order dated 19. 10. 2000, posting the petitioner in accounts Department.

( 3 ) THE Court vide order dated 20. 10. 2004 while issuing notice and without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties, had called upon respondents to consider if a position was available, where petitioner could be permitted to work as LDC on work-charge basis. Petitioner thereafter complained about the respondents treating the order as a request and not being acted upon by the respondent. The Dy. Director (Horticulture) was asked to file an affidavit. The Dy. Director (Horticulture) Najafgarh Zone has filed an affidavit stating therein that there is no work charge vacancy available for the post of LDC in hits zone. Further, he is not aware of any other vacancy in other zones, which would be in the knowledge of Central Establishment department of MCD.

( 4 ) I am not persuaded to accept petitioner s submission that the petitioner being eligible and having the qualifications for the post of ldc, should have been so appointed. In case of compassionate appointment there are number of circumscribing factors such as the percentage of posts that can be allocated for compassionate appointment, the vacancies which are available for respective posts, number of applicants, their respective circumstances entitling them to Compassionate appointment and their respective merits and qualifications. In such a situation, all persons who are eligible for the post may not get the same and have to accept a post lower in rank. The purpose and intent of compassionate appointment is to give immediate relief and succour to the bereaved family.

( 5 ) IT appears that in these circumstances, the petitioner had been offered the post of mali on compassionate appointment which was accepted by her. The petitioner cannot now agitate and state that she should have been considered and appointed as LDC for which allegedly vacancies had arisen. However, considering that the petitioner was from October,2000 performing clerical functions and has also gained some experience, the Director (Personnel) MCD is directed to consider if petitioner can be accommodated on work charge basis in the post of LDC, which may be available in the horticulture Department, subject to availability of vacancies. Petition is disposed of with aforesaid direction.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top