SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Del) 1123

MUKUL MUDGAL
DABUR INDIA LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
COLGATE PALMOLIVE INDIA LTD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARUN JAITLEY, GOPAL JAIN, MUKUL ROHTAGI, RAJIV NAYAR, SUDHIR K.MAKKAR

Mukul Mudgal, J.

( 1 ) THIS application seeking directions has been filed pursuant to the order of the Division Bench of this Court dated 14th October, 2004 which reads as follows:-

"during the hearing of the appeal, the appellant has given a modified version of a Story Board which is at page 83 to 86 of the paper book. Learned counsel for the appellant says that this Court may take modified version and decide the controversy in the matter. As a matter of fact learned Single Judge passed the order on the basis of the impugned Story Board which is at pages 37 to 41 of the paper book. Judicial proprietary demands that for modified version, a fresh application be filed by the appellant. Let an application be filed by the appellant before the learned Single Judge arid learned single Judge after affording the opposite party, an opportunity to hear will pass appropriate orders in accordance with law expeditiously. "

( 2 ) AS per the aforesaid judgment of the Division Bench, a modified version has been proposed by the defendant by this application. Some of the captions in the modified version, wherein the purchaser is asking for a dant Manjan and the Star of the advertisement Sunil Shetty i






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top