SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Del) 1158

MADAN B.LOKUR
GOVIND SINGH ATWAL – Appellant
Versus
MANKIRAT KAUR ATWAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.S.PHOOLKA, MALVIKA RAJKOTIA, SHARAT KAPUR

Madan B. Lokur, J.

( 1 ) STATISTICS available from the District Court suggest that there has been a steady increase in matrimonial cases for the last several years. This would naturally result in an increase in custody cases. Battles for the custody of children usually leave a taste of unpleasantness, if not in the child then in the parents. If litigating parents are able to sort out their disputes amicably, it is so much the better for them and for their children; but if that is not possible, there should be available some facility of professional Counselling.

( 2 ) FOR this, we need to seriously consider implementing the Family Courts act, 1984 in Delhi but if that cannot be done, then we need to adopt at least the principles laid down in the Family Courts Act and incorporate them into our justice delivery system. In addition, there is a need for organizations such as the delhi Legal Services Authority and the High Court Legal Services Committee to broad-base its volunteers and include professional Counsellors who can render useful assistance in cases involving matrimonial disputes and custody of children so that the unpleasantness is minimised, if not eliminated. The endeavour o




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top