VIKRAMAJIT SEN
AVNISH BAJAJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE (N. C. T. )OF DELHI – Respondent
( 1 ) ALLOWED, subject to all just exceptions.
( 2 ) THE accused is the CEO of Baaze. Com, which Company facilitates the sale of any property, for which it receives commission and also generates revenue from advertisements carried on its web pages. There is no gainsaying that it does not own the items offered for sale, the payment and delivery of which can be via a wholly independent agency. In the present case, Counsel for the State has argued that the accused was remiss, at the pain of culpability, in not stopping payment through Banking channels after learning of the illegal nature of the transaction. This prima facie indicates that, at the present stage of investigation the sale consideration was not routed through the accused. It is also not the case of the prosecution that the actual recording was viewable on the website. She, however, contends that the Item s description "dps Girl having fun should have raised alarm.
( 3 ) IT has been strenuously contended that if bail is not granted it will adversely impact e-commerce, for which India may be the eventual loser. These are not considerations which would prevail or tamper the Courts decision whether to gran
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.