MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, G.C.MITTAL
MANOHAR LAL – Appellant
Versus
UOI – Respondent
( 1 ) IN this writ petition a preliminary objection is raised by the respondents contending, inter alia, that no part of the cause of action has arisen within the territorial jurisdiction of this Court and, therefore, this writ petition cannot be entertained by this Court. In support of the said preliminary objection raised by the respondents, it was pointed out that what is challenged in the present writ petition is the order passed by the Commandant on 27th May, 2000 awarding to the petitioner the punishment of compulsory retirement from service. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid order the petitioner filed an appeal before his Appellate Authority, namely, the Deputy Inspector general of Police, Central Reserve Police Force. The said appeal was considered and disposed of by the Appellate Authority located in Allahabad, U. P. by issuing an order from Allahabad, UP which is dated 5th December, 2000. The petitioner could have filed a revision petition as against the aforesaid order but the said revisional remedy has not been invoked by the petitioner. It is pointed out that even the revisional authority is located at Lucknow.
( 2 ) IN the context of the aforesaid
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.