SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Del) 116

VIKRAMAJIT SEN
HARI RAM – Appellant
Versus
K. L. GANDHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.S.MANN, Rajinder Singh

VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J.

( 1 ) THIS Revision is directed against the Order of the learned Additional District Judge dated 2. 7. 1999. The facts of the case are that the Respondent, Mr. K. L. Gandhi had made a Statement on oath before the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi on 14. 7. 1994 to the following effect:

"i alongwith my brother Shri Prehlad Gandhi have sold the land bearing kh. No. 471/345 measuring (3-3-) 472/345 (3-6) totalling (6-9) situated in the revenue estate of vill. Dallupura vide assignment deed/sale deed in favour of Shri Hari Ram, S/o Shri Bhagwan r/o 118, Serai Kale Khan, New Delhi regd. At No. 396. Addl. book No. 1 volume no. 2552 pages 186 to 190 dt. 27. 1. 94. Now I have no interest in the aforesaid land/compensation. Compensation of the aforesaid land may be given to the applicant/assignee/vendee, Siri Hari Ram. The assignment deed is Ex. HR. Same is correct".

( 2 ) AS is evident an Assignment Deed had been executed by Shri K. L. Gandhi and Shri Pehlad Gandhi to the same effect as this Statement. In these circumstances the Petitioner had preferred an application under Order XXII Rule 10 which was disposed of with the observations that the proceedings had alre








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top