( 1 )

( 2 ) WITH the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, matter is heard for final disposal.

( 3 ) THE petitioner was appointed as the Assistant Sub Inspector in the delhi Police on 1. 3. 1988 and was thereafter given promotions and went on deputation to the CBI. In January, 1997 Central Government Employees welfare Organization introduced its third housing scheme in the National capital Region - Phase-II, Noida Housing Scheme at Sector 51. The petitioner applied in pursuance to the said scheme and paid all the amounts including the final demand made.

( 4 ) THE dispute arose on account of the fact that respondents No. 2 and 3, which is the Housing Organization, cancelled the allotment in favour of the petitioner on 30. 6. 1999 on the ground that the petitioner is not an employee of the Central Government but an employee of the Delhi Police and was, thus, not eligible to apply under the scheme. The petitioner made a representation against the same and even sent a certificate of the additional Deputy Commissioner of Police certifying that the petitioner is working in Delhi Police (Central Civil Employee ). The representation of the petitioner was re