( 1 ) PETITIONER has been refused the leave to contest the eviction petition filed on the ground of bonafide requirement of the premises vide order dated 19. 7. 2003.

( 2 ) THE sole ground and the premise on the basis of which the impugned order is being challenged is that the petitioner claims himself to be the owner of the premises on the strength that he occupied the premises in the year 1972 and since then he is occupying the premises and thus he has become owner of the premises by virtue of his adverse possession. On the contrary, the respondent land lady, who claims to have inherited the ownership of the premises from her husband, has produced house tax receipt as well as one agreement executed between her husband and the petitioner way back in the year 1967 showing the relationship of landlord and tenant.

( 3 ) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner contends vehemently that once relationship of landlord and tenant is challenged, tenant is entitled to leave to contest the eviction petition. There is no dispute as to this proposition of law as it is the owner of the premises who has right to seek eviction of the tenant and none less on the ground of bonafide requi