Manmohan Sarin, J.

( 1 ) LEARNED senior counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not wish to file reply. He submits that he will argue the application orally and rely on record.

( 2 ) THE applicant, Ms. Jyoti Sikka by this application seeks impleadment as a respondent in the writ petition. The writ petition had been filed by Mohinder Singh and Ors. , on 5. 12. 1984. The petitioners in the writ petition sought quashing of the order dated 13. 11. 1984, passed by the Financial Commissioner, as it maintained the withdrawal of plot No. 415 from the allotment to the petitioner and retained the allotment to Gaon Sabha.

( 3 ) THE applicant is a purchaser of 1 bigha of land vide Sale Deed dated 30. 4. 1987 from one Mishri, who is claimed to be the original owner and allottee from Gaon Sabha.

( 4 ) BEFORE taking note of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, it would be pertinent to notice that this very applicant had earlier moved an application-CM. 1661/90 for impleadment. The said application was also for impleadment, which was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 4. 4. 1990. Thereafter, the applicant moved another application bearing CM. No. 7806/90 for im

Click Here to Read the rest of this document