SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Del) 10

MADAN B.LOKUR
LALITA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
MEWA SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANAND KUMAR, O.P.GOYAL,

MADAN B. LOKUR, J

( 1 ) THE appellants are the parents (Appellants No. 4 and 5) of the deceased Vinod Kumar Dhiri. Appellant No. 1 is his widow and Appellants No. 2 and 3 are his two daughters. The deceased was sitting on the pillion seat of a motor cycle when it met with an accident on 26th October, 1983. A truck driven by Respondent No. 1 hit the rear of the motor cycle as a result of which the rider of the motor cycle as well as Vinod Kumar fell down. The wheels of the truck passed over Vinod Kumar and he died on the spot.

( 2 ) AT that time, the deceased was of 36 years of age and was working in a private company and earning Rs. 1,100/- p. m. as salary besides other benefits such as provident fund etc.

( 3 ) THE legal representatives of Vinod Kumar filed a petition under Section 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 and claimed a sum of Rs. 5. 00 lakhs as compensation on account of death of Vinod Kumar.

( 4 ) THE Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as "the Tribunal") framed the following issues:-

1. WHETHER the deceased Sh. Vinod Kumar Dhiri died as a result of rash and negligent driving of vehicle No. HRK-3842 on the part of respondent No. 1?

2. Whether the p












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top