SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Del) 67

BADAR DURREZ AHMED
CALLIPERS NAIGAI LTD. – Appellant
Versus
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.RAJPAL, N.K.KAUL, N.Menon, SANDIP AGARWAL

BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition has been filed by the petitioners, inter alia, praying for a writ of certiorari for quashing the impugned notice dated 30. 4. 2001 issued by the Respondent No. 1 (Assistant Collector, Grade-I, Room No. 5, Office of the Deputy Commissioner (South), Abdul Hamid Marg (M. B. Road), Saket, New Delhi ). The petitioners have also, inter alia, sought the issuance of an appropriate writ against the respondents preventing them from taking any coercive action against the petitioners on the basis of the aforesaid recovery notice dated 30. 4. 2001.

( 2 ) THE petitioner No. 1 took a loan from Respondent No. 3 (M/s Pradeshiya Industrial and Investment Corporation of U. P. Ltd.) - (hereinafter referred to as PICUP ). The petitioners 2 and 3 are the guarantors to the said loan taken by the petitioner No. 1 from PICUP. The petitioner No. 1 s registered office is at Delhi and the petitioners 2 and 3 also reside in Delhi. PICUP, however, does not have any office in Delhi.

( 3 ) THE learned counsel on behalf of PICUP submitted that this Court does not have the territorial jurisdiction to entertain this petition and, as such, this question be disposed of a





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top