( 2 ) WITH the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the petition is taken up for final disposal at this stage.

( 3 ) THIS is one more case of a retired Government servant who has been refused reimbursement of the full medical expenses incurred by him despite numerous judgments on this issue. The respondents chose to act in complete violation of the principles of law laid down by various judgments negating the Central Government Health Scheme (hereinafter to be referred to as, `the CGHS ), which was propounded as a health facility scheme for the Central Government employees so that they are not left without medical care after retirement. It was in furtherance of the object of a welfare State, which must provide for such medical care that the scheme was brought in force, but the repeated cases which have come to the Court show every effort of the respondents to dilute the effect of the said Scheme. The respondents continue in their conduct, which is contemptuous in character, by continuing to deny such claims despite clear law enunciated on this point.

( 4 ) NOW coming to the facts of the present case. The petitioner retired as a Government servant on 31. 12. 1980 as an Assist

Click Here to Read the rest of this document