SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
MANGALI ENTERPRISES LTD. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
( 1 )
( 2 ) LEARNED counsel for the respondent accepts notice of rule.
( 3 ) WITH the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the petition is take up for final disposal.
( 4 ) M/s Mangali Ceramics Limited was a limited company which had a certificate of importer/exporter dated 12,5. 2000 issued from file No. 05/04/130/00748 /am93 dated 04. 06. 1992 and was assigned 1kc No. 0592005372. The petitioner along with the requisite documents" filed an application dated 19. 6. 2004 for allotment of the said code to the petitioner. This was naturally done with the consent of M/s Mangali Ceramics limited.
( 5 ) THE petitioner did not receive any response and sent a reminder dated 5. 8. 2003 followed by reminders dated. 25. 8. 2003 and 10. 9. 200:?. It may be mentioned that in the letter dated 25. 8. 2003, the petitioner had mentioned that they have come to know that application of the petitioner was not processed on some misapprehension of a wrongful claim oi dkpb the letter categorically states that the petitioner had not availed of DKPB facility.
( 6 ) SINCE the petitioner did not receive any response, the present wnt, petition was filed seeking a direction agains
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.