SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Del) 532

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
MANGALI ENTERPRISES LTD. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.BHARDWAJ, Aseem Mehrotra

Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J.

( 1 )

( 2 ) LEARNED counsel for the respondent accepts notice of rule.

( 3 ) WITH the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the petition is take up for final disposal.

( 4 ) M/s Mangali Ceramics Limited was a limited company which had a certificate of importer/exporter dated 12,5. 2000 issued from file No. 05/04/130/00748 /am93 dated 04. 06. 1992 and was assigned 1kc No. 0592005372. The petitioner along with the requisite documents" filed an application dated 19. 6. 2004 for allotment of the said code to the petitioner. This was naturally done with the consent of M/s Mangali Ceramics limited.

( 5 ) THE petitioner did not receive any response and sent a reminder dated 5. 8. 2003 followed by reminders dated. 25. 8. 2003 and 10. 9. 200:?. It may be mentioned that in the letter dated 25. 8. 2003, the petitioner had mentioned that they have come to know that application of the petitioner was not processed on some misapprehension of a wrongful claim oi dkpb the letter categorically states that the petitioner had not availed of DKPB facility.

( 6 ) SINCE the petitioner did not receive any response, the present wnt, petition was filed seeking a direction agains
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top