H.R.MALHOTRA, DALVEER BHANDARI
SUPER CASSETTE INDUSTRIES LTD. – Appellant
Versus
ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK (INDIA) LTD. – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the order dated 20th October, 2003 passed by the Copyright Board at New Delhi in Case No. 10/2003. Appellant s main grievance is against the direction of the Copyright Board directing the Registrar of Copyrights to grant a compulsory license under Section 31 (1) (b) of the Copyrights Act, 1957.
( 2 ) IT is alleged that the appellant is one of the leading music companies engaged in the production and/or acquisition of rights in sound recordings. According to the appellant, through keen perception of ever changing consumer practices, infrastructural investment, technological upgradations and a skilled, cohesive work force, and an aggressive commitment towards quality, companies such as the appellant play a vital role in creating the music which then become available for the mass consumption.
( 3 ) ACCORDING to the appellant its most valuable asset is the copyrights in cinematographic films and sound recordings. The music of the appellant is either produced by the appellant at its own studios, or is acquired by way of assignments. It is alleged by the appellant that the songs produced and/or acquired by the appellant are sound
State of Orissa vs. Dr.(Ms.) Bina Pani Dei
State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. vs. Maharaja Dharmender Prasad Singh and Ors
L. Hridaya Narain vs. Income Tax Officer, Bareilly
Gramophone Company of India Ltd. vs. Birendra Bahadur Pandey and Ors.
Barium Chemicals Ltd and Another vs. Company Law Board
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.