MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA
INTERSTATE EQUIPMENT (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
BHARAT ALUMINUM COMPANY LIMITED – Respondent
( 1 ) THE respondent invited tenders by issuing a Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) dated 30. 9. 1982 for design, manufacture, erection, testing and commissioning of "aerial Ropeway System" for the Gandhamardan Bauxite Mines in Orissa.
( 2 ) IT is specifically stated in the petition that the said tender was invited at New Delhi. The tender submitted by the petitioner as against the aforesaid Notice Inviting tender from New Delhi was received by the respondent at New Delhi and by a letter of acceptance dated 13. 10. 1983 sent by the respondent from New Delhi, the respondent awarded the aforesaid work on turnkey basis to the petitioner. On receipt of the said letter the petitioner also wrote to the respondent at their office at New Delhi acknowledging the letter of acceptance dated 13. 10. 1983 sent from New Delhi stating that the bank guarantee as sought for would be furnished. However, due to certain agitation by tribals of the locality, namely, at Paikual the field activities of the project had to be stopped. Finally by a letter dated 29. 2. 1988 the petitioner informed the respondent about the financial implications as a result of the suspension of the project wo
REFERRED TO : Sukumar Chand Jain v. DDA
Govt. of Orissa v. Sarbeswar Rout
N.S.Nayak and Sons v. State of Goa
Thyssen Stahlunion Gmbh v. Steel Authority of India Ltd.
Bhagwan Dass Kedia v. Girdhari Lal
M/s.Progressive Constructions Ltd. v. Bharat Hydro Power Corporation Corporation Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.