SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Del) 165

B.A.KHAN, B.N.CHATURVEDI
CHOKHA RAM – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Barkha Babbar, MOHAR SINGH

B. N. CHATURVEDI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner, a constable in Border Security Force (BSF), was on 11th of February, 2002, at about 8. 00 p. m. ordered by Assistant Commandant, Shri Rajiv Bhardwaj, Company Commander, to proceed from `d Coy to BOP Rajatal, A Coy situate at a distance of about 3 kms. close to the international border. He, however, did not comply with that order. On 12th of February, 2002, Shri S. K. Wadhwa, Commandant, 19 Bn. BSF ordered record of evidence against the petitioner for disobedience to his superior officer s command, which amounted to an offence under Section 21 (1) of the BSF Act, 1968. Shri K. S. Rai, second in command, in pursuance thereof, conducted proceedings relating to record of evidence on 13th of February, 2002. In the course of such proceedings, the petitioner after recording of statements of prosecution witness, on being called upon to do so, made a statement admitting that he had not carried out the orders of his Company Commander for his movement from `d Coy to `a Coy stating that he would be moving out the next day.

( 2 ) CONSEQUENT upon record of evidence, by an order dated 20. 2. 2002, Shri S. K. Wadhwa, Commandant, ordered assembly of Sum



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top