Manmohan Sarin, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application moved by the petitioner under Section 340 Cr. PC read with Sections 191 and 193 of the Indian Penal Code against respondents 1 to 7, who are respondents 7 to 13 in CW 4827/2001.

( 2 ) THE petitioner s case is that the answering respondents have made false averments and produced forged documents with a view to mislead and take advantage in the legal proceedings. It may be noted that the writ petition itself had been disposed of by this Court vide orders dated 19th September, 2001. By the said order, petitioner was directed to file the appeal before the Financial Commissioner by 30th September, 2001 and the Financial Commissioner was required to decide the application for stay within next 10 days. This order was passed in view of Mr. Ashok Nath, assuming additional charge as Financial Commissioner under Section 64 of the Land Revenue Act. The benefit of the interim order was to enure to the petitioner till then. In view of the order, as aforesaid, the writ petition stood disposed of.

( 3 ) PETITIONER, at the same time, had moved the present application. Petitioner requested for discharge of respondents 1 to 6 in the writ petition who we

Click Here to Read the rest of this document