SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Del) 218

R.S.SODHI
RAKESH SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.R.Thakur, V.K.Malik

R. S. SODHI, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is directed against the judgment dated 29. 7. 1998 of the additional Sessions Judge whereby the learned judge while upholding the sentence has dismissed the appeal, which appeal arose out of the order of the Metropolitan Magistrate whereby the learned Magistrate held the accused guilty under Section 279/304-A IPC and vide separate order sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for six months under section 279 and imprisonment for one year with a fine of Rs. 500/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo S. I. for two months under Section 304-A IPC. Both he sentences of imprisonment were directed to go together.

( 2 ) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not wish to challenge the conviction on merits but submits that this is a fit case where accused can be considered and admitted to the benefits of the Probation of Offenders Act. He relies upon a judgment of the Supreme Court in Aitha Chander rao Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, 1981 scc (Cri) 637 wherein it has been held that in a case where the accused is released on probation, his conviction should not affect his service as per Section 12. He submits that the in





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top