SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Del) 343

MANMOHAN SARIN
LG HOTLINE CPT LTD. – Appellant
Versus
VIACOM ELECTRONICS LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
SHASHANK KUMAR SINGH, Sudhir Makkar

( 1 ) PETITIONER-M/s. L. G. Hotline CPT Ltd. , has filed the present petition under Section 2 and Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India, seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Respondent No. 1 being M/s. VIACOM Electronics Ltd. , Respondent No. 2, Baron International Ltd. and Mr. Kabir Mulchandani and Ms. Shakun Mulchandani, respondent Nos. 3 and 4, who are stated to be both having controlling interest in M/s. VIACOM Electronics Ltd.

( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to the filing of the contempt petition may briefly be noted:-

(I)PETITIONER M/s. LG Hotline CPT Ltd. , had instituted suit bearing No. 2620/2001 under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for recovery of a sum of Rs. 6,73,08,364/- from the defendants M/s. VIACOM Electronics Ltd. , and Baron International Ltd. The defendants in the suit, respondent Nos. 1 and 2 herein, had sought leave to defend. Defendant No. 1 vide IA. No. 8196/2002 had sought leave to contest. Defendant No. 2 vide IA. No. 5385/2002 had sought leave to defend. Pleadings were completed. On 14. 1. 2003, adjournment was sought on behalf of counsel for de









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top