SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Del) 389

MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA
ALFRED DUNHILL LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
R. P. S. CHAWLA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Abhai Pandey, Beruar, Gaurav Duggal, RAHUL AGARWAL, V.P.Dalmia

Mukundakam Sharma, J

( 1 ) BY this order I propose to dispose of the injunction application filed by the plaintiff which was registered as I. A. No. 416/2004.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff is one of the most well known international brands in the world for its exquisite and diversified range of luxury and fashion goods. The plaintiff s business includes inter alia designing, creation, manufacture, marketing, distribution and worldwide sale of a wide and diversified range of fashion, luxury and utility goods including those for cars, automobile accessories, men s clothing, watches and wall clocks, writing instruments, small jewellery, leather goods including leather desk sets, ladies hand bags, wallets, leather bill folds, key fobs, stationery, and other products like fragrances, umbrellas, toiletries, travel accessories, liquor, baggage, etc. The extent of reputation and goodwill of the plaintiff has been aptly stated both in the plaint as also in the application filed by the plaintiff seeking for a temporary injunction. The plaintiff carries on the business under the trade name, trading style and trademark `dunhill and accordingly the trademark `dunhill of the plaintiff forms the key, dom








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top