SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Del) 428

MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA
DABUR INDIA LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
EMAMI LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.S.CHANDHIOK, ARJUN BHANDARI, ARUN SINHA, SUDHIR K.MAKKAR, V.P.Singh

MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, J.

( 1 ) BY this order, I propose to dispose of the application, which is filed by the plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure praying for a temporary injunction. The plaintiff is a leading manufacturer of a large range of pharmaceutical products, toiletries, ayurvedic and other medicinal preparations. The plaintiff is manufacturing and marketing its products under the brand name dabur , which is a well-known brand in India and abroad. The plaintiff in the course of its business also manufactures and markets Dabur Chayawanprash, which is being sold not only in India but also in various other countries. It is claimed by the plaintiff that the plaintiff has a market share of 63% of the total market of Chayawanprash through India. Chayawanprash , which is an ayurvedic formation, is primarily a health tonic and has therapeutic qualities for enhancing the immunity against various diseases.

( 2 ) THE defendant is also engaged in the manufacture of various ayurvedic formulations including Chayawanprash. The defendant is manufacturing the said Chayawanprash under the brand name Himani Sona-Chandi Chayawanprash. The defendant has very rec












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top