SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Del) 1076

P.C.JAIN
VOGEL MEDIA INTERNATIONAL – Appellant
Versus
JASU SHAH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMARJIT SINGH, BINNY KALRA, PRAVEEN ANAND, SUDHIR CHANDRA

R. C. JAIN, J.

( 1 ) THIS ORDER WILL GOVERN THE DISPOSAL OF IAS nos. 3762/2004, 5668/2004 NOVED ON BEHALF OF THE plaintiffs AND IA NO. 6730/2004 MOVED ON BEHALF OF THE defendants. BY WAY OF IA NO. 3762/2004, THE PLAINTIFF has PRAYED FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING THE AMENDED plaint PURSUANT TO THE ENHANCEMENT OF THE JURISDICTIONAL value OF THE SUIT AND FOR PERMITTING THE SAID AMENDMENT to BE INCORPORATED CONCURRENTLY WITH THE AMENDMENT OF THE plaint. VIDE IA NO. 5668/2004 A PRAYER HAS BEEN MADE ON behalf OF THE PLAINTIFF TO CONFIRM THE CONTINUANCE OF THE ad-INTERIM INJUNCTION DATED 1. 5. 2001 IN THE PRESENT SUIT unless IT IS SPECIFICALLY VACATED BY A REASONED ORDER under ORDER XXXIX RULE 4 CPC OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO make AN ORDER OF STATUS QUO AS ON 30. 4. 2004 I. E. THE DATE of THE ORDER OF THE DISTRICT COURT ORDERING RETURN OF THE plaint TO THE PLAINTIFF, TO BE OBSERVED BY THE DEFENDANT till THE RELIEF CLAIMED ABOVE IS ADJUDICATED UPON AND decided. A DIRECTION IS ALSO SOUGHT THAT THE PRESENT suit BE DEEMED TO HAVE CONTINUED FROM THE STAGE ON WHICH it WAS TRANSFERRED TO THE DISTRICT COURT PURSUANT TO section 2 OF THE DELHI HIGH COURT (AMENDMENT) ACT, 1999. VIDE IA NO. 6730/200
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top